About us

We were not looking for a problem for AI. We automated our own work

RestoAudit grew out of Syrve rollouts and hands-on cost control in restaurants. The same checks came back month after month, restaurant after restaurant. First we ran them by hand, then we wrote them down, then we turned them into a system.

Talk to the founder
10 years
of hands-on cost control and Syrve rollouts in restaurants
300+
restaurants where we set up the back office and took food cost apart
2 countries
Latvia and Germany - restaurants running on RestoAudit
0
outside investors - the product grows on customer revenue

Manual work - rules - a system

Not one step was invented at a desk. Every check started as a spreadsheet and a call with a supplier.

first
Syrve rollouts

Setting up the back office, item catalogues and recipes in hundreds of restaurants. We saw from the inside where the chain from invoice to plate cost breaks.

What it taught us: a back office records facts, it does not check them
then
Cost control by hand

Opening invoices, comparing prices with earlier deliveries, catching duplicates and cases booked as kilograms, explaining food cost gaps.

What it taught us: the checks turned out to be the same in every restaurant
next
The repeatable part became rules

We wrote down every recurring check: what we compare, against what, what counts as a deviation. That is where thresholds from a restaurant's own history and conversion to the base unit came from.

What it taught us: consulting work became a set of reproducible rules
today
Rules became a system

RestoAudit runs those checks on every document, every day. People step in where a decision is needed: dispute a price, fix a line, confirm a norm.

What it taught us: control stopped depending on whether anyone had time for it
Restaurant software records what happened. Nobody checks whether it makes sense. For ten years I did that check by hand - opened invoices, compared prices, traced where food cost came from. The work was always the same. That is what had to be automated, not «AI adopted».
Konstantin Talikov
Founder and CEO of RestoAudit.ai
Experience
Syrve rollouts, 300+ sites, more than 10 years
Practice
Hands-on cost control in restaurants in Latvia and Germany
Role today
Owns the check methodology and reviews exceptions with clients
Availability
Answers email personally, within the same working day

Four conclusions the product is built on

Each one follows from a specific mistake we made or watched happen in a restaurant.

01
Every restaurant has its own norm

We tried uniform deviation thresholds. In one restaurant they produced a hundred signals a day, in another they stayed silent for months. A market average price means nothing if your supplier delivers to you on contract.

In the product: thresholds are computed from the delivery history of that restaurant and that supplier
02
A signal without an amount gets ignored

Nobody works through a list of «212 deviations». People work through the three lines that say what it costs per month. A finance director needs euros, not percentages and not a count of exceptions.

In the product: every exception carries its effect in euros for your purchase volume
03
Automation must not touch money

We have seen where automatic posting leads. An error in a unit of measure spreads across the whole cost calculation, and finding it later costs more than manual entry ever did.

In the product: the system finds and explains, a person makes the decision that moves money
04
Control breaks on the lack of time

Checks are skipped not because nobody can do them, but because there is no spare hour in the evening. Any process that depends on the team's free time breaks in the first busy week.

In the product: the check runs every day without the team, people only come in for the decision

A working system, not a presentation

RestoAudit processes documents from real restaurants in Latvia and Germany every day. Only the numbers that come with a base and a period are listed here.

475
documents processed in a month
24 500
price changes measured to calibrate thresholds
64%
of them exactly zero: the price repeated to the cent
6
countries whose suppliers' invoices have reached us
4 languages
documents in LV, DE, EN and RU

Measured on our own invoice flow, May-July 2026. Documents arrive by email, in Telegram and over PEPPOL.

Promises you can verify

We sell control over money. That only works on trust, and trust rests on the concrete limits we placed on ourselves.

Ask the founder a question
Nothing is posted without a person confirming

We read Syrve dictionaries, sales and stock; an invoice is written back only after confirmation. We change no settings, rights or reference data, and access is revoked in one click.

Data is processed in the EU

The list of subprocessors and the retention periods are published in the privacy policy. We sign the DPA before connecting; deletion after the period on request.

Your prices stay yours

Purchase history works for your company. We do not sell or publish your prices and supplier agreements.

An honest figure instead of a potential

In the period report we show the amount the team actually acted on, not a «potential saving».

We answer ourselves

Questions about methodology and signals go to our team - the same people who ran this control by hand for ten years.

Your data is already in Syrve.

Let someone actually watch them - the way we did it by hand for 10 years. 30 days on your own numbers.